ihategovernment
ihategovernment ihategovernment
  • 27-10-2020
  • History
contestada

What were the dissenting opinions (the judges against the majority) in Shaw v. Reno?

Respuesta :

ivymcfadden11 ivymcfadden11
  • 27-10-2020
Answer: The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause. On the other hand, bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965

Explanation:based on race and protection read what I typed for answer for more information
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Determine the value of x + 7p if x = -1 and p = 8​
ANSWER QUICKLYYYYY!?!?
what reasons did colonists give the causes and necessity of taking up arms declaration for the conflict with British
1 Which of the following describes compounds? a. are composed of two or more elements that are chemically combined b. are random combinations of elements c. are
to ________, lance, an hr manager, shares his company’s job openings on social media and online job postings.
what information is on most business cards
(3 x 62) - 25 + n = 166
YOU CAN SOMEONE HELP, ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
What motivated people to join the Revolutionary War both as Patriots and Loyalists?
If a car's velocity increases to 30 m/s from rest in 6 s, what is its acceleration? QUESTION - What is the variable Vf equal to? ​